🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours before the NYC mayoral election, Michael Lange issued a significant electoral prediction – going beyond the winner overall, but block by block. Lange, an expert in elections born and raised in New York City, devoted more than ten years in progressive politics and emerged as something of a local celebrity this year for his thorough analyses into municipal statistics and voter surveys.

He released his extremely precise prediction map – accurately predicting that the progressive candidate would win although missing Andrew Cuomo’s solid showing – on his newsletter, his platform. He has a flair for clever terms. He highlighted, for instance, the split between the “commie corridor”, stretching from Park Slope to another area to a third locale, where he forecasted (accurately) that the left-wing candidate would win by large leads, and the “capitalist corridor” on affluent parts of Manhattan. In those areas, certain media outlets and Wall Street Journal outrank the mainstream paper” in audience and most voters favored Cuomo, campaigning as a moderate alternative.

Voting Day Trends and Unexpected Results

What was your election night?

I had to do that since they were adding around 200,000 votes into the tally every few minutes! I felt a little nervous initially: The candidate led the early vote by a dozen percentage points, but there were two big batches of ballots that came in later and his lead dropped from 12% to 8%. It was concerning.

Understand, there was a world where yesterday went somewhat badly for him, where the opponent would have basically doubling his votes from the earlier contest. However the winner gained half a million votes to his initial base, and this was critical why he won. He went out and massively expanded his base from the first round.

Expanding Support

Where did Mamdani get those extra votes from?

He assembled the coalition that progressives always wanted to build: it’s multiracial, youthful, it’s renters and individuals facing cost pressures. He improved significantly with Black and Hispanic voters, working- and middle-class voters, compared to the earlier election. Plus he further maximized his base of left-leaning activists, young leftists, and immigrant groups. He couldn’t have won without expanding his appeal.

He built the alliance that progressives long aimed for: multiracial, youthful, tenants and people squeezed by affordability

There were also a number of Trump/Mamdani voters – is this significant?

It is a genuine phenomenon, confined to working-class Latinos, Asian communities and Muslims. Voters in ethnic enclaves that went for Trump previously went for Zohran now. However I wouldn’t say he was gaining Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Turnout and Effects

One of the big stories of the night was the record participation. Who benefited?

Each candidate. Turnout was significantly higher than I had expected. I thought we might go over 2 million, but it reached 2.3 million – which is a lot of darn voters. There was a decent opposition group, energized, but the Mamdani base was also motivated, and that sufficed to win.

You forecasted he’d exceed 50% of the vote. Is he likely for that?

Currently you would say he’s favored to get over 50%. He has 50.4% but there’s still around 200K ballots uncounted as of Wednesday morning. So I don’t think certain, but I believe probable, and I hope he does because afterwards none can claim the Republican was a spoiler.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the Republican candidate, is the other big story. His vote completely collapsed.

He didn’t win any district in any area. Including one neighborhood in the borough, similar to an highly conservative neighborhood. That truly surprised me. The independent held Caucasian districts, affluent zones and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained many conservatives on Staten Island who had a high participation. I believe occurred significant tactical voting by the Republicans. This happened prior to the former president tweeted his support for the candidate, but that definitely helped. It could have even turned the tide unless Mamdani’s coalition hadn’t grown.

The “Commie Corridor”

What about your often-discussed left-wing base – was support for Mamdani dominant in those areas of Brooklyn and Queens?

In my view there was some weakening of the progressive zone in some areas like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. There, instance, the property owners and residents all went for the independent. So there was a little resistance. However no, largely the commie corridor is another huge reason why Zohran won – he scored between high percentages in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Community Support

Prior to the election there was coverage on whether the candidate was gaining ground with the community. Any indication that he succeeded?

Exist areas with many secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – like Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he did well. However in the affluent districts like the Manhattan area, his Middle East stance was influential there. Similarly in the more middle-class Jewish areas like Queens neighborhoods, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they favored the independent. And also, you have newcomers from the former Soviet Union in the borough, they were strongly supportive. So it’s unclear if there were crazy narrative-busters on this one, but Mamdani retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the Upper West Side by big margins.

Long-Term Significance

Did Mamdani redefine what the city means politically? Will the progressive base become a launch pad for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s no coincidence that some of the biggest figures from the left hail from a handful of neighborhoods in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I believe that we’ll see additional examples – people will come from these areas to be elevated nationally.

However I think that each urban center in America could develop similar progressive hubs. Cities are the centers of leftwing power in America – because they’re young, tenancy is common and they are places where individuals struggle by the inequalities exist.